ODAC News

 

Wednesday 16 May

 

The Oil Depletion Analysis Centre

 

 

1/   Coal’s Future in Doubt          (Global Public Media [MuseLetter], Wed 09 May)

2/   Congress Told FAA Lacks Road Map For NextGen     (AVWeb, Wed 09 May)

3/   China's Bohai Bay may hold 146 bil barrels oil reserves: report (Platts, Thu 10 May)

4a/  Saudi to boost gas reserves by 40% (Arabian Business, Wed 09 May)

4b/  Saudis to step up natural gas output (The Financial Times, Thu 10 May)

5/   Easy profits herald global oil crunch   (The Financial Times, Thu 10 May)

6/   Companies eye Iran’s gas fields        (The Financial Times, Thu 10 May)

7a/  Kuwait’s Oil Minister should “Mind His Ps & Qs” (Proven, Probable & Possible – Quantity & Quality)     (ODAC, Tue 15 May)

7b/  The Search For Solid Ground On Oil Reserves           (Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, Mon 14 May)

8/   The AAPG Oil Reserves Conference, Nov 2006 - How Much Is Left?     (ODAC, Fri 11 May)

9a/  Banks are heading for disaster, says Bolton  (The Times, Wed 16 May)

9b/  Housing costs taking their toll of society        (The Times, Fri 11 May)

10/  What Stern Got Wrong        (Prospect, May 2007)

 

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

1/         Coal’s Future in Doubt     (Global Public Media [MuseLetter], Wed 09 May)

 

http://globalpublicmedia.com/heinberg_coals_future_in_doubt

 

Comment:    Richard Heinberg discusses the second of two recent reports that suggest all is not well with the world’s endowment of coal supplies. Rather than focus on when a peak in global coal production might occur, Coal’s Future in Doubt, according to Heinberg – the report is not published yet, focuses more on unreliability of supplies and the price of coal.

 

Article:    … The EWG (Energy Watch Group ) report has enormous implications for climate change, global energy, and particularly for future electricity supply and steel production in the US and China. Previously, virtually everyone in the fields of energy policy and energy analysis—as well as nearly everyone involved in discussions about climate change—had assumed that the world’s coal endowment was so enormous that no limits would be encountered anytime this century. The EWG’s conclusions turn this assumption on its head.

 

... Therefore any new analysis of global coal supplies, following on the heels of the EWG report, warrants considerable interest.

 

We have not had to wait long. “The Future of Coal,” a study by B. Kavalov and S. D. Peteves of the Institute for Energy (IFE), prepared for European Commission Joint Research Centre, is ready in final draft and will be published within days.

 

Unlike the EWG panel, Kavalov and Peteves did not attempt to forecast a peak in global production. Future supply is discussed in terms of the familiar but often misleading reserves-to-production (R/P) ratio. Nevertheless, the IFG’s conclusions are broadly supportive of the EWG report.

 

The three primary take-away conclusions from the new coal study are as follows:

 

• “World proven reserves (i.e. the reserves that are economically recoverable at current economic and operating conditions) of coal are decreasing fast….

• “The bulk of coal production and exports is getting concentrated within a few countries and market players, which creates the risk of market imperfections.

• “Coal production costs are steadily rising all over the world, due to the need to develop new fields, increasingly difficult geological conditions and additional infrastructure costs associated with the exploitation of new fields.”

 

Early in their paper the authors ask, “Will coal be a fuel of the future?” Their disturbing conclusion, many pages later, is that “The analysis in the preceding chapters indicates that coal might not be so abundant, widely available and reliable as an energy source in the future.” Along the way, they state “the world could run out of economically recoverable (at current economic and operating conditions) reserves of coal much earlier than widely anticipated.”

 

... In other words, the authors are not attempting the same task as the EWG team: there is no quantitative analysis of reserves for individual nations here. Instead, the focus is on foreseeable challenges to coal supply, and how these will likely affect cost—and hence the attractiveness of coal vis-à-vis other energy sources.

In the course of their discussion, the authors highlight some of the same problems noted in the EWG study having to do with differing grades of coal and the likelihood of supply problems arising first with the highest-grade ores:

 

... Taken together, the EWG and IFE reports deliver a shocking message. For a world already concerned about future oil supplies, uncertainties about coal undercut one of the primary strategies—turning supposedly abundant coal into a liquid fuel—that is being touted for maintaining global transport networks. The sustainability of China’s economic growth, which has largely been based on a rapid upsurge in coal consumption, is thrown into question. And the ability of the US to maintain its coal-powered electricity grids in coming decades is also cast into doubt...

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

2/         Congress Told FAA Lacks Road Map For NextGen (AVWeb, Wed 09 May)

 

http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/FAA_Lacks_Clear_Road_Map_For_NextGen_195171-1.html

 

Comment:    From an ODAC News reader:

 

“They don’t get it do they, spending money on infrastructure that probably won’t be needed. Note the bit by Dr Gerald Dillingham from the GAO talking about ‘high risk’; what did the GAO have to say about Peak Oil recently (www.energybulletin.net/28618.html), obviously departments aren’t talking to each other. “

 

You need to log in to get the whole article, free registration.

 

Article:    The FAA says that the current national airspace system won't be able to handle the expected tripling of air traffic by 2025, and there's generally no disagreement among stakeholders about the need for ATC modernization. But it is how we get there that is the big problem. In opening statements before a hearing Wednesday morning on ATC modernization, House Subcommittee on Aviation Chairman Jerry Costello, D-Ill., brought up the FAA's poor track record of previous ATC modernization projects and promptly added that "vigorous congressional oversight" will be needed for NextGen. DOT Inspector General Calvin Scovel testified that NextGen is a "high-risk effort" that will "involve billion-dollar investments by both the government and airspace users." During questioning, he submitted that the FAA and Joint Planning Development Office (JPDO) need to have a detailed R&D plan developed before Congress can properly appropriate funding for ATC modernization.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

3/         China's Bohai Bay may hold 146 bil barrels oil reserves: report  (Platts, Thu 10 May)

 

http://www.platts.com/Oil/News/9190129.xml?p=Oil/News&sub=Oil?src=energybulletin

 

Article:   The Bohai Bay in northern China may hold oil reserves equivalent to 20 billion mt (146 billion barrels), with half of it still undiscovered, the official China Daily reported Thursday, citing an upstream expert with the Chinese Academy of Engineering.

 

The Bohai Bay rim is believed to have about 60 structures similar to the newly found Jidong Nanpu oil field, the report cited CAE's Zhai Guangming as saying. Zhai is also the first manager of the Jidong Oilfield Co. under Chinese state-owned China National Petroleum Corp, according to the report.

 

The CAE professor, however, also noted that these undiscovered structures would be more difficult to find.

 

CNPC's publicly-listed business arm PetroChina last Friday said its discovery of the Jidong Nanpu oil field in the shallow waters of the Bohai Bay has a total of four oil-bearing structures. It has confirmed geological reserves of 1.02 billion mt (7.46 billion barrels) of oil equivalent, including 905.6 million mt (6.62 billion barrels) of crude reserves and 140.1

billion cubic meters (4.95 Tcf) of gas.

 

PetroChina intends to start developing the Jidong Nanpu oilfield as soon as possible. The first-phase of the project, to be finished by 2012, will produce 10 million mt/year (200,274 b/d). 

 

Output is expected to rise progressively to 25 million mt/year, making the oilfield China's third largest after Daqing and Shengli.

 

Han Xuegong, professor with the CNPC Managers Training Institute in Beijing, said news of a major oil discovery in the Bohai Bay rim had been  circulating within CNPC since last year. But the formal announcement of the discovery was only made last week.

 

Han said he believed this was a signal that PetroChina might have also come across other large hydrocarbon structures which the Chinese oil giant has yet to announce, the Xinhua news agency reported. 

 

Han added that based on a primary recovery rate of 40% for oil fields in general, Jidong Nanpu's overall output would be about 408 million mt of oil equivalent if no further discoveries are made in the acreage.

 

Using PetroChina's peak 25 million mt/year production goal for Jidong Nanpu as a reference, the field would have a lifespan of about 20 years.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

4a/        Saudi to boost gas reserves by 40%    (Arabian Business, Wed 09 May)

 

http://www.arabianbusiness.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=12396:saudi-to-boost-gas-reserves-by-40&Itemid=72

 

Comment:    From what the article says, it is not so much that Saudi Arabia has the gas reserves and just needs to find them and bring them onstream, it is more a case of it will be short of gas if it doesn’t:

 

Saudi Arabia faces increasing demand for natural gas from its rapidly growing population and new petrochemical and industrial projects. Domestic gas sales were expected to rise by 40% through 2012 from the current level of around 7 billion cubic feet per day, Naimi said.”

 

Article:    Saudi Arabia is stepping up exploration to boost its natural gas reserves by around 40% in the next 10 years as it prepares to meet rising domestic demand, Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi said on Wednesday.

 

"We are planning to add in the next 10 years 100 trillion cubic feet to our current reserves of gas," Naimi told a conference on economic development in Riyadh.

 

The kingdom holds the world's fourth largest natural gas reserves at 252 trillion cubic feet, Naimi said.

 

Saudi Arabia faces increasing demand for natural gas from its rapidly growing population and new petrochemical and industrial projects.

 

Domestic gas sales were expected to rise by 40% through 2012 from the current level of around 7 billion cubic feet per day, Naimi said.

 

The kingdom plans to drill 186 exploration wells for gas and 332 development wells by 2012, Naimi said. That was higher than a figure of around 70 gas exploration wells given by an Aramco executive last November.

 

Gas output from the offshore Karan gas field will start in 2012, Naimi said, a year later than previously planned. He gave no reason for the delay.

 

Karan is a $3 billion development that will yield domestic gas sales of 770 million cubic feet per day, Naimi said.

 

The kingdom has opened its gas fields to international firms to help meet demand growth. The upstream oil sector of the world's largest crude exporter is off limits to foreign investors.

 

Four consortia of European, Russian and Chinese firms were awarded gas exploration blocs in the Empty Quarter in 2003 and 2004.

 

 

4b/        Saudis to step up natural gas output        (The Financial Times, Thu 10 May)

 

Comment:    The title in the print version reflects more accurately what the article is about: “Saudis to spur manufacturing with natural gas production”

 

Article:    Ali Naimi, Saudi Arabia’s oil minister, said on Wednesday that the kingdom was stepping up the exploitation of natural gas to promote local industries and create jobs for the growing population.

 

Mr Naimi said the kingdom would use growing supplies of natural gas and feedstock from related petrochemicals facilities to form clusters of industries, such as car manufacturing, building materials, household appliances and metals.

 

“This programme will allow the kingdom to enter into a new phase of industrial investment,” Mr Naimi told a conference in Riyadh, adding that the government would work with the private sector to develop the projects.

 

The programme is accompanied by growing investment in infrastructure through four multibillion dollar “economic cities” across the country.

 

State energy giant Saudi Aramco is moving away from its traditional role as an oil and gas producer to develop its role in the downstream processing of the kingdom’s hydrocarbons reserves.

 

Aramco is building petrochemicals and refining complexes with Japan’s Sumitomo on the Red Sea coast and the US’s Dow Chemical on the Gulf. These and other Saudi joint ventures with guaranteed bargain-priced Aramco gas allocations will provide the feedstock for the industrial clusters.

 

… The main aim of the programme is to create some of the estimated 100,000 new jobs needed every year to stop unemployment levels creeping up from the official level of 9 per cent among Saudi males.

 

But labour is also the issue of most concern to foreign investors, say economists. The labour ministry’s programme of putting quotas on the number of Saudis employed by companies can prove a big hurdle as many Saudis lack the skills and refuse menial work.

 

Mr Zamil said the ministry was “responsive on this issue”, with plans to reduce the Saudi quota in the industrial sector to 15 per cent from the current 30 per cent.

 

Mr Naimi said the programme would be fuelled by rising gas output from the kingdom, with reserves expected to rise by 100,000bn cubic feet, or about 40 per cent, over the next 10 years. Domestic gas sales are expected to rise by 40 per cent from 7bn cubic feet a day by 2012, he said.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

5/         Easy profits herald global oil crunch    (The Financial Times, Thu 10 May)

 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/9ed783da-fe6d   -11db-bdc7-000b5df10621.html

 

Comment:    An interesting article from the FT that summarizes well why Peak may be near for non-geological reasons. Suggests that Russia, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait might be all be close to their production peaks, because they choose to.

 

Article:    … Companies are able to get more out of oil fields than they expected even a decade ago. Yet if they cannot access those fields, the oil within is not going to come to market.

 

A study by PFC Energy, the respected consultancy, shows world oil supplies might well fall behind growing demand in the long term as political factors limit production capacity increases in key producing nations.

 

“The full impact of the nationalisations that took place in the 1960s and 1970s are taking effect now,” says Robin West, chairman of PFC Energy.

 

… The report singled out Mexico, Venezuela, Iran and Iraq as declining producers. It listed Russia and Kuwait as stagnant producers and Saudi Arabia – only just – as an expanding producer, with qualifications.

 

Venezuela could significantly increase production if it encouraged investment in heavy crude. Yet its move this month to nationalise major fields is likely to have the reverse effect, as the international oil companies get less for their investment.

 

In Iran, prospects for capacity increases are not favourable, given the political environment.

 

Iraq is seen as a “wild card”. Pre-war production capacity was significantly higher than current levels, but new investment could reverse that trend.

 

PFC lists the stagnant producers as Russia and Kuwait. Russia’s production levels are expected to flatten, it says, and without better management and capital, investment inflows are likely to remain flat. That seems especially probable given President Vladimir Putin’s statements that current output levels are “appropriate”.

 

Kuwait’s courting of international oil companies to boost production has stalled on political infighting.

 

Saudi Arabia has said future demand for its production may advance its efforts, but Saudi Aramco, its national oil company, has said increasing production too much might run down its reserves faster than the country would like.

 

The impact of continued depletion and stagnation of oil production capacity will not be felt for some time, given that other producers are expanding production, many of them in partnership with international oil companies.

 

In Kazakhstan, Angola and Nigeria, for example, production is expanding with the aid of outside investors, says PFC, which says that Brazil has created a strong and innovative national oil company that funds and develops production increases on its own.

 

“The scale of these additions, however, is limited and will peak in relatively short order,” PFC says.

 

Whether the declining and stagnant producers will step in at that point remains to be seen…

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

6/         Companies eye Iran’s gas fields            (The Financial Times, Thu 10 May)

 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/6f017cd6-fe92-11db-bdc7-000b5df10621,_i_nbePage=83fca288-3039-11da-ba9f-00000e2511c8.html

 

Comment:    As much as they have a lot natural gas reserves, few Middle East countries are net exporters, and some are short of gas. The one that has huge known reserves that are largely undeveloped is Iran. As this article points out, while the international oil companies are to an extent queuing up to develop Iran‘s gas fields, few have actually got beyond signing memorandums of intent – some companies have been negotiating for years.

 

Article:    This year alone three of Europe’s biggest energy groups have announced they are considering investing billions of dollars in Iran’s giant gas fields.

 

But a non-binding memorandum of understanding signed late last month by OMV, the Austrian energy group, and similar recent accords with Anglo-Dutch Royal Dutch Shell and Repsol, of Spain, do not necessarily mean those companies are about to sink large sums into Iran and incur the wrath of Washington, which is trying to isolate Tehran over its nuclear ambitions. Instead, these are ways companies are trying to keep their options open until the international diplomatic situation improves or Iran forces them to stop procrastinating.

 

Frank Harris, analyst at Wood Mackenzie, the consulting group, said: “Access to gas around the world is getting tougher and the big players cannot afford to ignore Iran. They need to retain the option to participate in Iran because the political winds may change, which is why we are seeing the non-binding deals.”

 

No European company has made a large new investment in Iran since Norway’s Statoil invested $2.65bn (€1.9bn, £1.3bn) in 2002, says Kenneth Katzman, a Middle East expert at the Congressional Research Service. While some have made friendly overtures and promised to consider investing, those in more advanced negotiations have delayed decisions that would have forced them to commit large sums of money.

 

… Even Lukoil, Russia’s second biggest oil company, is cautious. Vagit Alekperov, its chief executive, said recently: “Today Russia is making resolutions with other UN Security Council members aimed at stopping the Iranian nuclear programme. So we are now looking at the risk.”

 

… But companies may not be able to drag their feet for ever. Iran has already asserted its muscle in negotiations it views as having lasted too long. Late last year it slashed the stake of Japan’s Inpex, which was to develop the giant Azadegan oil field, from 75 per cent to 10 per cent after the group – under pressure from the US – had delayed a final decision several times.

 

Not only Inpex is feeling the heat from the White House. In March, Nicholas Burns, a senior state department official, told a congressional hearing the US had contacted several governments and companies to warn them they would be in violation of the Iran Sanctions Act if they pursued their planned investments in Iran. Such threats appear to have worked for the Europeans, but not for energy-hungry Asian companies which are calling Washington’s bluff.

 

Passed in 1996 as the Iran Libya Sanctions Act, the law requires Washington to place sanctions on non-US companies investing more than $20m a year in Iran. But the White House has the right to decline to act if it deems it in the US’s national interest. So far not one company has been sanctioned despite at least 14 violations totalling $100bn since 1999, the Congressional Research Service reported.

 

How long Total, Shell and others are able to postpone deadlines will depend in part on whether Iran can lure suitors, such as those from China and India. In the past three years, Chinese, Indian and Malaysian companies agreed to invest more than $90bn to purchase Iranian gas, develop oil and gas fields and build pipelines, LNG terminals and other energy infrastructure, Mr Katzman said in a report.

 

China National Offshore Oil is negotiating a $16bn dollar deal to develop Iran’s North Pars gas field.

 

However, there is a catch: these new Asian investors are relatively untested and it is far from certain they have the ability to develop vast, complex oil and gas projects, especially without being able to rely on US technology or contractors, which are banned.

 

But Mr Harris points out: “There is always the possibility the Iranians may attempt to do the first LNG project without IOC help (probably with the Chinese), accepting it may take longer and be less efficient but that it gets them into the game.”

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

7a/        Kuwait’s Oil Minister should “Mind His Ps & Qs” (Proven, Probable & Possible – Quantity & Quality)          (ODAC, Tue 15 May)

 

http://www.odac-info.org//bulletin/documents/BGC_Kuwait_Oil.htm

 

Comment:    Barry G. Claverhouse, based in the Middle East, is a regular contributor to the ODAC website. Here he discusses Kuwait's announcement last weekend that its proven oil reserves really are only about 48B barrels, and wonders if other OPEC members will also downgrade their reserves - for 'safety' reasons.

 

Article:   ... In actual fact, the PIW [Petroleum Intelligence Weekly] report states that the figure of 48 billion barrels was “Probable” while “Proven” was 24 billion barrels. Trouble with those “P’s” again! So it now appears that Kuwait’s leaders have had a change of heart and become at last a bit more open in the space of a few days. The big question is now whether this surprise revelation will result in similar reserve downgrades in other OPEC nations? May we indeed be on the brink of a series of Competitive Reserve Downgrades in OPEC where to keep their quotas lower at levels they can actually produce they will reduce reserve figures?...

 

 

7b/        The Search For Solid Ground On Oil Reserves         (Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, Mon 14 May)

 

http://www.energyintel.com/DocumentDetail.asp?document_id=202116

 

Subscribers only. I read a copy at the London-based Energy Institute’s library.

 

Comment:    This was an article written by Sadad al-Husseini, retired executive vice president of Saudi Aramco. It was in response to a PIW survey of global oil reserves published last month (see here for a brief summary of the PIW Global Oil Reserves Survey). Sadad was highly critical of the survey, despite the fact that it concluded “trend in worldwide liquids reserves is actually one of stagnation and modest decline”. In fact, his article read very much like that of a Peak Oiler. He was critical that the survey included Canadian tar sands, and suggested that as these were solids that can only be produced very slowly, they should not have been included in the survey as ‘oil’ reserves. Sadad was also very critical of the USGS survey, saying that they were mixing reserves and resources, and that the IEA were issuing similarly suspect numbers. Towards the end of the article, he stated that globally we have produced 1 Trillion barrels of oil, that we are half way thro the reserves, and that we have produced the easy and most economical half. He made many other interesting points, these were the main ones.

 

The content of the article is not new to members of the Peak Oil community, it is who wrote it that is of interest.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

8/         The AAPG Oil Reserves Conference, Nov 2006 - How Much Is Left?      (ODAC, Fri 11 May)

 

http://www.odac-info.org//bulletin/documents/AAPG_Nov2006.htm

 

Comment:    Towards the end of last year, 2006, an important meeting took place that should have been reported by the mainstream media, but passed by unnoticed. The meeting was invitation-only, free of media and consultants, with the intention of bringing together leading experts to discuss and establish as best as possible the world’s remaining oil reserves. That ODAC is aware of, only the Oil and Gas Journal reported on the conference. ODAC discusses some of the highlights as reported in the Oil and Gas Journal, then reviews some of the conclusions reached at the conference, from an ODAC source who attended the conference.

 

Article:   … The OGJ article states that “Undiscovered resources are the best understood source of future additions. Worldwide estimates of undiscovered oil resources presented at the AAPG Convention, drawn from an augmented version of the USGS Worldwide Assessment, range from 480 to 1,550 billion bbl.” Note that this is summarising the USGS data, which was generally found to be five times too high compared to the other conference participants with original data. A more realistic value is the figure of 200 to 300 B for yet-to-find conventional oil.

 

The main source of growth in oil reserves will be from existing oil fields, anywhere between 200 billion to 1 trillion barrels, the uncertainty is massive. This compares with only 200-300 B barrels yet-to-find.

 

While there are truly massive amounts of unconventional oil, the conference noted up to 10 trillion barrels mainly consisting of Canadian tar sands, Venezuelan heavy oil and USA shales, the production from these sources is never likely to be high. Interestingly, the estimates from the conference are significantly lower than is usually quoted in the media. Only 2 Mb/d by 2015 for Canadian tar sands and 100,000 b/d for USA shales.

 

Saudi Arabia may well have 260 B barrels of oil remaining, but it will largely be slow and expensive to extract. The amount of Saudi conventional oil yet-to-find is a fraction of other estimates, only 60 B barrels.

 

The OGJ article states: “World oil production reaches the peak by 2020-40, the rate will be 90-100 million b/d, only 10-20% higher than it was in 2005”. This allows for a lot of uncertainty, or is it political acceptability? Peaking by 2020 is at the upper range of most current forecasts (Peaking of world oil production: Recent forecasts, R. Hirsch, April 2007), but it would still entail a lot of pain if the global community is not prepared. But it also means that the current rate of 85 Mb/d is not far off the maximum of 90-100 Mb/d. A peak rate of 90 Mb/d would suggest a peak date much sooner than 2020, indeed closer to 2010 than 2020.

 

Interpreted as it should be, the results of this conference should have alarm bells ringing. 200 to 300 billion barrels of conventional oil yet-to-find is not very much, indeed it is less than the amount which “is either being developed or planned for future development” (OGJ item 4). And the forecast production from Canadian tar sands and USA shales indicates that this source can not be counted on to make a significant impact on world supply in the next ten years. The most important aspect of this conference is who attended – the world’s leading experts with original industry oil reserves data. This implies that the estimated remaining reserves concluded from this conference are likely to be more accurate than any others.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

9a/        Banks are heading for disaster, says Bolton (The Times, Wed 16 May)

 

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article1796033.ece

 

Article:   Anthony Bolton, the influential Fidelity stockpicker, has given warning that banks are heading for disaster by recklessly lending huge sums to private equity firms.

 

Mr Bolton, who yesterday began the handover of his Special Situations fund to his successor, Sanjeev Shah, said that it was increasingly difficult to find value in large companies because of the liquidity boom.

 

The 55-year-old fund manager said private equity firms were themselves surprised by the cheap borrowing available to them. “I think the phrase is ‘covenant-lite’, but in many cases it appears to mean no covenant at all,” Mr Bolton said.

 

Under the terms of covenant-lite loans, borrowers can skip the usual quarterly tests that compare a company’s cash-flow with its level of outstanding debt. Apax was the first British private equity firm to use the loans, in its acquisition of Trader Media from the Guardian Media Group in March…

 

 

9b/        Housing costs taking their toll of society        (The Times, Fri 11 May)

 

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/columnists/article1774685.ece

 

Comment:    Various commentators have been warning of a potential housing crash in the UK for years. ‘Optimists’ say this is proof they were/are all wrong, others might conclude that if the conditions for a crash still exist, they just got their timing wrong.

 

Various Peak Oil analysts have suggested higher unemployment is virtually guaranteed as a result of not being prepared for Peak Oil.

 

Article:   One of the unplanned but most intractable legacies of the Blair decade is the distortion of any normal or sustainable relation between house prices and people’s incomes. If that link is not already broken it is certainly stretched to the limit.

 

The rate of price inflation may be slowing, just, but remains obstinately high.

 

The question that always accompanies fresh data showing a fast-growing housing market is: are we headed for a crash? The short answer, at present, is no.

 

Yesterday’s quarter-point rise in rates will not make much difference and was not intended to. Few of the most vulnerable borrowers pay higher mortgage interest immediately just because the Bank’s rate has gone up.

 

A run of four rate rises must, however, put more pressure on new buyers. Allowing for high prices and higher interest rates, they are likely to have to pay a fifth more interest each month than a year ago.

 

But in London, which is again driving the price increases, interest rates have the least effect because far more properties are bought with bonuses or foreign money.

 

The squeeze on incomes must eventually tell. Next month’s new selling regulations may cool the market a little more. But there will not be a price crash unless there is a much sharper rise in unemployment than currently looks likely...

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

10/        What Stern Got Wrong      (Prospect, May 2007)

 

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?search_term=strahan&id=8954

 

Comment:    The Stern Report published Oct 2006 was seen as a major breakthrough for those wishing governments to take global warming more seriously. Stern suggested that tackling global warming now might be a lot cheaper than waiting until later. However, as discussed by David Strahan writing in Prospect, the Stern Report avoided any discussion of Peak Oil, and thus missed the opportunity to tackle the two problems together, while raising the profile and urgency of Peak Oil.

 

Article:   Stern asks rhetorically whether there are sufficient fossil fuels to fulfil economic growth forecasts, or whether fossil fuel shortage would provide a laissez-faire solution to climate change by forcing up the price and depressing demand. He concluded that, “There appears to be no good reason… to expect large increases in real fossil fuel prices to be necessary to bring forth supply.” In the case of oil, this conclusion was based largely on a resource assessment by the International Energy Agency (see graph, below). And with that, Stern regurgitated the facile assumption that because the available resource is large, there will be no problem with supply in the foreseeable future.

 

... Everything else is considered "non-conventional," in which the significant resources are bitumen and so-called oil shales, usually found in solid, non-pressurised deposits near the surface, which have so far produced very little. Stern’s assumption is that because all these forms of oil are allegedly economic at less than today’s crude price, there can be no shortage in the foreseeable future. This is a dangerous delusion.

 

... What makes Stern’s omission the more surprising is that two of Tony Blair’s closest advisers believe global oil production will peak by around 2015. David Manning—Blair’s chief foreign policy adviser in the run-up to Iraq—seems to think it will come at “some point between 2010 and 2020,” while chief scientific adviser David King told me in 2005, “ten years or less.” The government’s official position, however, is that there is nothing to worry about until after 2030. Is there something they’re not telling us?

 

**********************************************************************************************************