ODAC News

 

Sunday 01 July

 

The Oil Depletion Analysis Centre

 

 

Iraqi Oil Production / Meeting Demand

1a/  IEA: without Iraqi oil, we'll be in deep trouble by 2015  (The Oil Drum: Europe, Thu 28 Jun)

1b/  Americans Are Gluttons For Mideast Oil        (The Day [Connecticut], Sun 24 Jun)

 

Natural Gas

2a/  EU pipeline project loses momentum            (International Herald Tribune, Tue 26 Jun)

2b/  Turkmen leader vows to increase natural gas exports to Russia           (International Herald Tribune, Tue 26 Jun)

2c/  Norway to boost natural gas exports to European Union          (International Herald Tribune, Tue 26 Jun)

 

Peak Oil in Ireland

3a/  Energy debate must include all options         (The Meath Chronicle, Wed 27 Jun)

3b/  A Royal week of Aussie sprinters, Irish first-timers, Fortune's success and a Coronation           (Independent [Ireland], Sun 24 Jun)

 

Peak Oil and Transport

4a/  IATA report: Fuel replaces labour as largest cost for airlines in 2006    (domain-B.com, Tue 26 Jun)

4b/  Researchers warn of 'transport poverty'          (ABC News [Australia], Wed 27 Jun)

 

Peak Oil Report

5/   Energy Alarmism: The Myths That Make Americans Worry about Oil    (Cato Institute, Thu 05 Apr)

 

Middle East Energy Shortages

6a/  'Paradox' as Mideast faces power shortage    (Arabian Business, Tue 12 Jun)

6b/  UAE diverts 50 pct of gas meant for oil to power         (Reuters, Tue 26 Jun)

 

Economy

7a/  Caliber becomes latest victim of US sub-prime mortgage market         (The Independent, Fri 29 Jun)

7b/  BIS warns of Great Depression dangers from credit spree       (Telegraph, Mon 25 Jun)

 

Big Oil / Geopolitics

8/   For some oil companies, Venezuela is hardly the worst option (International Herald Tribune, Thu 28 Jun)

10/  The Problem's Not Peak Oil, It's Politics        (BusinessWeek, Thu 28 Jun)

 

Biofuels

9/  The Great Corn Con - The Senate's preposterous new ethanol bill          (Slate, Tue 26 Jun)

 

Iran / Petrol Rationing

11/   Iran in crisis after cleric's murder      (The Australian [The Sunday Times], Mon 02 Jul)

 

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

1a/        IEA: without Iraqi oil, we'll be in deep trouble by 2015         (The Oil Drum: Europe, Thu 28 Jun)

 

http://europe.theoildrum.com/node/2721#more

 

Comment:    Translation of an article from French to English quoting Fatih Birol, chief economist of the International Energy Agency. As with the Al-Husseini brothers (Moujahed Al-Husseini and Sadad Al-Husseini, the latter formerly Saudi Aramco’s Executive Vice President for Exploration and Production and a Member of its Board of Directors), Fatih is becoming increasingly outspoken.

 

Article:    In a stunning interview for the French (reference) daily Le Monde, Fatih Birol, the chief economist of the International Energy Agency (i.e. the intergovernmental body created after the oil shocks of the 70s to coordinate the West's reaction to energy crises) effectively says that peak oil is just around the corner, and that without Iraqi oil, we'll be in deep trouble by 2015:

 

"If Iraqi production does not rise exponentially by 2015, we have a very big problem, even if Saudi Arabia fulfills all its promises. The numbers are very simple, there's no need to be an expert"

 

The whole interview is amazingly frank and free of diplomatic obfuscation. He blasts biofuels ("not based on any kind of economic rationality"), he notes that Africa is suffering the most already from expensive oil, he points out that even a slowing of China's growth will not reduce oil demand, and he talks pretty explicitly about production peaks and depletion.

 

... He says it again twice in the interview: the gap between demand and supply will widen, and he blasts our governments for doing so little...

 

 

1b/        Americans Are Gluttons For Mideast Oil          (The Day [Connecticut], Sun 24 Jun)

 

http://www.theday.com/re.aspx?re=878e8f8a-6132-4447-a7a2-9d338f1d6fad

 

Comment:    James Howard Kunstler points out that if the US pulls out of Iraq completely, the resulting oil deficit will bring an end to the lifestyle to which Americans have become accustomed. James is not suggesting that the US stay in the Middle East, but that they start preparing for an alternative, less energy intensive, lifestyle.

 

Article:    It seems you can call the situation in Iraq a lot of things, but it's not a war. Not at this point, anyway. Call it an unsuccessful nation-building project, a failed occupation, a botched policing job. All the U.S. political factions, from left to right, do the public a disservice by calling it a war, because it misrepresents what we're doing there. We're involved in Iraq because we don't want to begin thinking about modifying our behavior at home. We are desperate to preserve our access to Middle East oil because that is the only way we can keep running our society the way we're used to running it. Mostly, we don't want to face the tragic misinvestments we've made in the infrastructure of happy motoring, and we don't want to face the inconvenient truth that there really isn't any combination of alternative fuels that will permit us to keep running all the cars the way we like to run them. Either we keep getting the oil or say goodbye to the American Dream Version 2.K.

 

... I'm waiting for one of these birds to tell the American people the truth: You can't have it both ways. You can't get our military out of the Middle East without changing the way we live.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

2a/        EU pipeline project loses momentum  (International Herald Tribune, Tue 26 Jun)

 

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/06/26/business/EUgas.php

 

Comment:    The IHT reports that the planned Nabucco gas pipeline is looking less likely than ever.

 

Article:    The consortium attempting to build a natural gas pipeline that would reduce the European Union's dependence on Russian natural gas has failed to agree on financing or finding another partner to make the project viable.

 

Interviews with members of the Nabucco consortium Tuesday disclosed that the pipeline - proposed in 2002 by the European Commission as the bloc's first attempt at forging a common energy security policy - may be threatened by another project with similar intent.

 

On Saturday, Gazprom, Russia's state-owned giant natural gas monopoly, and Eni, the Italian natural gas company, announced an agreement to build a competing pipeline to the EU, a move that exposed the lack of unity inside the 27-member bloc over forging a long-term energy security policy.

 

The Nabucco project seems to be losing momentum, as it runs behind schedule and over budget, members of the consortium said.

 

... Russia already supplies a quarter of the bloc's natural gas. But the EU's demand for gas is expected to rise to 720 billion cubic meters, or 25.4 trillion cubic feet, in 2015 from around 500 billion cubic meters in 2005, and Nabucco was supposed to meet part of this demand.

 

"You have to remember that Turkey depends on Gazprom," Engur said. "We have to have good relations with Gazprom. In any case, Turkey, as a member of Nabucco, wants to open up the gates for gas from Azerbaijan and Iran so that there can be diversification." Once Nabucco is running at full capacity, probably by 2025, Engur said, 15 percent of Europe's natural gas supply could come from Central Asia.

 

Analysts said the delays and divisions inside the consortium were being exploited by Gazprom, which they said appeared determined to capture as much of the market as soon as possible in southeastern Europe, part of the route mapped out for Nabucco.

 

Gazprom, tightening its grip on the market in Europe even before the construction of the Nabucco project has started, recently forged separate deals with OMV and Mol, even though these two companies are part of Nabucco...

 

 

2b/        Turkmen leader vows to increase natural gas exports to Russia            (International Herald Tribune, Tue 26 Jun)

 

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/30/business/AS-FIN-Turkmenistan-Russia-Gas.php

 

Comment:    Turkmenistan is increasing gas supplies to Russia, but may also supply alternative gas pipelines.

 

Article:    Turkmenistan's president has vowed to increase natural gas exports to Russia, state media reported Saturday.

 

Gurbanguli Berdymukhamedov also said his country would develop a U.S.-backed undersea Caspian pipeline along with a gas pipeline that runs along the seashore favored by Moscow, signaling a desire to balance relations with key powers and maintain neutrality.

 

"We will increase exports of our gas through the Caspian shores to Russia," Berdymukhamedov said in televised comments, without elaborating. Turkmenistan currently sells 50 billion cubic meters (1.7 trillion cubic feet) of gas to Russia per year.

 

Berdymukhamedov was referring to an agreement last month to build a Moscow-backed pipeline that would carry gas from Turkmenistan into Europe along the shores of the Caspian sea.

 

But the Turkmen leader also said his nation would develop a U.S-favored pipeline across the Caspian Sea to the west that would tap into the gas pipelines that cross the South Caucasus, bypassing Russia. Washington is intent on building the pipeline because it meets a U.S. and European strategy of securing sources of crude and gas outside the Middle East, and drawing Caspian states away from Russia and closer to the West.

 

"Without joining any political alliances we will continue efforts to build pipelines to China, to Pakistan and India through Afghanistan, and to Europe through the Caspian," Berdymukhamedov said in televised comments.

 

"That way we will maintain mutually beneficial relations with Russia, the United States, with European countries and other neighbors."

 

The United States and Russia are jockeying for influence in Turkmenistan, which has the second-biggest gas reserves among all ex-Soviet republics after Russia, and whose resources are playing an increasingly important role in regional politics.

 

 

2c/        Norway to boost natural gas exports to European Union  (International Herald Tribune, Tue 26 Jun)

 

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/25/europe/EU-GEN-Norway-EU-Energy.php

 

Comment:    The source of this story seems to be Andris Piebalgs, the EU's energy commissioner. Given just how rich Norway is from selling oil and gas, there is absolutely no incentive for it to sell more gas to Europe. This story will have a more solid foundation when the source is Norwegian. Note that increase the journalist is talking about is 90 bcm (billion cubic metres) to 125-140 bcm, a rise of 35-50 bcm. The UK alone will probably be importing about 80 bcm by 2020, roughly 10 bcm net last year.

 

Article:    Norway plans to increase its natural gas supplies to the European Union by up to 55 percent by the middle of the next decade, the EU's energy commissioner said Monday.

 

"This is important taking into account the expected growth of gas consumption and the need for additional gas supplies in the EU in the years to come," Andris Piebalgs said in a statement released during his visit to the Nordic country.

 

The EU is pushing Norway to boost its gas supplies so the 27-member bloc can reduce its dependence on Russian oil and gas. Norway, which is not an EU member, has made a fortune on oil and gas deposits in the North Sea and is now exploring new finds in the Barents Sea it uneasily shares with Russia.

 

Piebalgs said gas supplies from Norway could grow to 125-140 billion cubic meters per year by the middle of the next decade, up from the current 90 billion cubic meters.

 

Norwegian oil minister Odd Roger Enoksen said gas exports would increase later this year when new offshore fields come on line, including Ormen Lange in the North Sea and Snoehvit in the Barents.

 

Enoksen and Piebalgs also discussed carbon capture and storage technology used to prevent carbon dioxide from being released into the atmosphere. They visited the Sleipner offshore field, where Norway has been storing carbon dioxide beneath the seabed for more than 10 years.

 

"Carbon capture and storage could contribute substantially in our efforts to reduce the world's CO2 emissions," Piebalgs said.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

3a/        Energy debate must include all options          (The Meath Chronicle, Wed 27 Jun)

 

http://www.meathchronicle.ie/opinion/editorial/energy-debate-must-include-all-options-807976.html

 

Comment:    RTE, an Irish television channel, ran a Peak Oil program a week or two ago. It will be reviewed in a forthcoming newsletter. This is what the first sentence is referring to. You can see from this editorial that the Irish media are way ahead of the UK, and just about everywhere else, in discussing and understanding Peak Oil.

 

Article:    RTE’S recent ‘Futureshock: End Of The Oil Age’ programme and its dire predictions of an impending energy crisis will hardly have come as a surprise to those who have followed the debate in recent years about ‘peak oil’.

 

As anyone who has turned on a TV or listened to a radio in the past couple of years will tell you, oil is a finite resource that we have been using like snuff at a wake, and now there’s not a lot left. Soon, all the oil that is being discovered will no longer replace all that has been produced, global production will peak and then begin to terminally decline.

 

... In a nutshell, oil depletion (along with climate change) is probably the most serious crisis ever to face industrialised society and yet governments around the world are still incredibly ill-prepared to meet the extraordinary challenge this will pose. Virtually every single item we possess or need is due to oil in one form or another. However, no clear consensus has emerged on what happens next. Will existing hydrocarbon technologies be adapted to new realities or will radical new technologies emerge, like hydrogen fuel cells, to complement renewable energy sources like solar and wind energy?

 

... It has been interesting over the past year to hear the tentative beginnings once again of discussions on nuclear energy as a possible future energy option to produce electricity. It’s an emotive subject in this country that often sparks a hostile reaction towards those who dare to raise it.

 

... Whether or not nuclear ever forms part of the mix in Ireland, the reality is that this country remains extremely vulnerable to a global energy shock and must use the next decade to intensively examine all our options to generate power into the future.

 

Renewables like wind and wave power have potential, for sure, but they cannot provide for all the country’s needs and are unreliable sources of electricity unless adequate technologies can be developed to store the power they generate.

 

 

3b/        A Royal week of Aussie sprinters, Irish first-timers, Fortune's success and a Coronation            (Independent [Ireland], Sun 24 Jun)

 

http://www.independent.ie/sport/horse-racing/a-royal-week-of-aussie-sprinters-irish-firsttimers-fortunes-success-and-a-coronation-742637.html

 

Comment:    An ODAC News subscriber says:

 

“Peak Oil now on Sport Pages. Hard To Believe.”

 

However, this is Ireland, where ASPO-Ireland / Colin Campbell have done an excellent job of raising the general public awareness of Peak oil.       

 

Article:    WHERE have all the people gone? Commuting time from the Arundel restaurant to the parade ring has been practically halved versus last year when grid-iron shoulders and a crash-helmet served as the best means of navigating from A to B. So large are the gaping spaces in the enclosures today, the Agoraphobics' Society are considering cancelling their attendance for the rest of the week.

 

One place they might have felt more comfortable was in the winner's enclosure following the King's Stand Stakes which felt like downtown Melbourne in rush-hour with the Australians filling a one-three-four in the big sprint.

 

Tracey Collins was momentarily 'Most Unpopular Woman Down Under' for deigning to spoil their clean sweep with Dandy Man and if one consequence of Peak Oil is that it makes it untenable for the Aussies to travel over next time then our sprint trainers will be happier than most to herald the end of the Oil Age and move to a more sustainable energy source...

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

4a/        IATA report: Fuel replaces labour as largest cost for airlines in 2006     (domain-B.com, Tue 26 Jun)

 

http://www.domain-b.com/aero/June/2007/20070626_iata.htm

 

Article:    The Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation (CAPA) reports that a recent International air Transport Association (IATA) sample of the financial reports of 45 major global airlines reveals that fuel replaced labour as the largest single cost item for the global airline industry in 2006. This marks the first time ever that fuel costs have outpaced that of labour.

 

According to the IATA analysis, fuel accounted for 25.5 per cent of total operating costs for carriers in 2006, up from 22.5 per cent in 2005, while labour (including pension) expenses fell from 24.2 per cent in 2005, to 23.3 per cent in 2006.

 

The rise reflects the sharp increase in fuel prices faced by airlines, including a rise in the average price of jet fuel per barrel from US$34.70 in 2003 to $81.90 in 2006...

 

 

4b/        Researchers warn of 'transport poverty'         (ABC News [Australia], Wed 27 Jun)

 

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/06/27/1963181.htm?section=business

 

Comment:    2005/2006 there were a few articles in the USA media along the same theme as petrol prices rose. In the USA, and in this case Australia, people travel for an hour or more to get to work, and if they do not earn much it makes a big difference to their ability to pay for higher petrol/gasoline prices. Less of a problem in Europe because petrol is so highly taxed already, people travel shorter distances, and public transport is usually not bad, at least in cities.

 

Article:    Petrol prices weigh on the mind of any motorist, but there are predictions that if the cost of fuel continues to rise, the poorest Australians will be forced to quit work because travelling to and from their jobs will be unaffordable.

 

Researchers are calling it transport poverty, and it is a concept that will be presented to a conference in Melbourne today.

 

On the outskirts of Melbourne alone, at least 20,000 families earn less than $500 per week but run more than two cars.

 

Monash University's chair of public transport Graham Currie says the price of petrol does not have to rise much more before those families simply will not be able to afford to fill up the tank...

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

5/         Energy Alarmism: The Myths That Make Americans Worry about Oil     (Cato Institute, Thu 05 Apr)

 

http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8161           Web introduction

 

http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa589.pdf   Report (PDF, 177 Kb)

 

Comment:    Wikipedia: “The Cato Institute is a libertarian think tank headquartered in Washington, D.C.”  In a nutshell, an anti-Peak Oil report from pseudo-economists. Enough said, except that the Cato Institute is an influential think tank.

 

Article:    From the web introduction.

 

… Each of those fears about oil supplies is exaggerated, and none should be a focus of U.S. foreign or military policy. "Peak oil" predictions about the impending decline in global rates of oil production are based on scant evidence and dubious models of how the oil market responds to scarcity. In fact, even though oil supplies will increasingly come from unstable regions, investment to reduce the costs of finding and extracting oil is a better response to that political instability than trying to fix the political problems of faraway countries. Furthermore, Chinese efforts to lock up supplies with long-term contracts will at worst be economically neutral for the United States and may even be advantageous. The main danger stemming from China's energy policy is that current U.S. fears may become a self-fulfilling prophecy of Sino-U.S. conflict. Finally, political instability in the Persian Gulf poses surprisingly few energy security dangers, and U.S. military presence there actually exacerbates problems rather than helps to solve them.

 

Our overarching message is simply that market forces, modified by the cartel behavior of OPEC, determine most of the key factors that affect oil supply and prices. The United States does not need to be militarily active or confrontational to allow the oil market to function, to allow oil to get to consumers, or to ensure access in coming decades.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

6a/        'Paradox' as Mideast faces power shortage   (Arabian Business, Tue 12 Jun)

 

http://www.arabianbusiness.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14259:paradox-as-mideast-faces-power-shortage&Itemid=72

 

Comment:    Over the past year or so, ODAC News has reported cases of energy shortages in the Middle East. It tends to be natural gas, and tends to lead to power cuts. Iran, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar, Saudi Arabia have all had problems of one sorts or another. And we want to import lots more natural gas from there. No wonder the International Energy Agency is worried about OECD gas supplies.

 

Article:    Oil and gas-rich countries of the Middle East are facing a worrying paradox - how to meet rapidly expanding power demand to feed their fast growing economies, the International Energy Agency said on Tuesday.

 

"Shortages of natural gas - hitherto the fuel of choice for electricity generation - have become a regular feature, forcing governments to consider alternatives such as coal, fuel oil, nuclear and even imported gas," the IEA wrote.

 

Abu Dhabi is expected to divert gas from its oilfield injection programme this summer in order to run power stations and desalination plants, the IEA said in its monthly report.

 

A large gas-fired power station serving the United Arab Emirates will be obliged to run two of its trains on gas oil, requiring some 50 tanker trucks a day, it added.

 

"But gas oil itself is scarce," the IEA said. "In Qatar, trucks must reportedly wait up to six hours to refuel."

 

Kuwait has warned there will be power cuts this summer.

 

For most countries local gas is not a short-term option because projects take a long time to develop.

 

Qatar, with the world's third biggest gas reserves, is considering using coal. Saudi Arabia, the world's leading oil exporter, and Oman are considering building coal-fired plants, according to the IEA.

 

The agency said liquefied natural gas (LNG) was another possibility for energy hungry Middle East economies. Kuwait for example is reportedly considering building a terminal with Royal Dutch Shell and BG, the IEA said.

 

"Other countries are envisaging power imports, with Bahrain willing to purchase electricity from Saudi Arabia," it added.

 

 

6b/        UAE diverts 50 pct of gas meant for oil to power      (Reuters, Tue 26 Jun)

 

http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=allBreakingNews&storyID=2007-06-26T100214Z_01_L26905454_RTRIDST_0_UAE-GAS-UPDATE-1.XML

 

Comment:    More on UAE natural gas diversion.

 

Article:    Tight gas supplies have forced the United Arab Emirates to divert to power generation plants around 50 percent of the gas it had earmarked for boosting oil output, the country's oil minister said on Tuesday.

 

"It's almost fifty-fifty," UAE Oil Minister Mohammed al-Hamli told reporters, when asked how much gas was being taken away from oilfield reinjection for use in power plants.

 

 

"Power generation demand is seasonal. Now there is a lot of demand for reinjection gas (to be diverted to power)," Hamli said.

 

As temperatures rise in the desert Gulf Arab states, power demand soars with air conditioning needs. The seasonal rise has further strained the UAE's gas system, already short of supplies to meet the demands of its rapidly expanding economy.

 

Gas is used to maintain pressure in oil reservoirs to maximise crude output. Hamli did not give the volume of gas being diverted from the fields of the world's sixth largest oil producer.

 

... The UAE holds the world's fifth largest gas reserves, at over 200 trillion cubic feet, but has failed to develop them quickly enough to keep pace with domestic demand.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

7a/        Caliber becomes latest victim of US sub-prime mortgage market            (The Independent, Fri 29 Jun)

 

http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article2720151.ece

 

Comment:    Caliber is a UK investment fund.

 

Article:    Aftershocks from the collapse of the sub-prime mortgage market in the US continued to be felt across the world yesterday, as a UK-listed investment fund promised to shut its doors and a major private equity house was forced to scale back plans for a fundraising.

 

In the UK, Caliber, a quoted investment fund that has raised $250m (£125m) to invest in the credit markets, most of it in US sub-prime mortgages, said that its investors had asked it to wind up the ailing business rather than try to find a way to reverse its losses.

 

... Sub-prime mortgages are home loans for Americans with poor credit histories. Large numbers of these mortgages are parceled together and then sold off in pieces as CDOs to investors across Wall Street and beyond. Because they are backed by monthly mortgage payments, investors such as Caliber were able to argue that they were relatively safe assets. However, demand for CDOs was so high that lenders offered mortgages to more and more people with a higher and higher credit risk, and arrears are now at record levels. The value of the CDOs has collapsed.

 

Caliber is the second British fund this week to report difficulties. Queen's Walk Investment said that it lost $91m last year because it had to write down the value of its portfolio...

 

 

7b/        BIS warns of Great Depression dangers from credit spree            (Telegraph, Mon 25 Jun)

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/06/24/cnbis124.xml

 

Comment:    When the bankers’ bank, the Bank for International Settlements, warns of a second great depression, it is more difficult to dismiss than say, a warning from the Peak Oil community.

 

Article:    The Bank for International Settlements, the world's most prestigious financial body, has warned that years of loose monetary policy has fuelled a dangerous credit bubble, leaving the global economy more vulnerable to another 1930s-style slump than generally understood.

 

"Virtually nobody foresaw the Great Depression of the 1930s, or the crises which affected Japan and Southeast Asia in the early and late 1990s. In fact, each downturn was preceded by a period of non-inflationary growth exuberant enough to lead many commentators to suggest that a 'new era' had arrived", said the bank.

 

The BIS, the ultimate bank of central bankers, pointed to a confluence a worrying signs, citing mass issuance of new-fangled credit instruments, soaring levels of household debt, extreme appetite for risk shown by investors, and entrenched imbalances in the world currency system.

 

... In a thinly-veiled rebuke to the US Federal Reserve, the BIS said central banks were starting to doubt the wisdom of letting asset bubbles build up on the assumption that they could safely be "cleaned up" afterwards - which was more or less the strategy pursued by former Fed chief Alan Greenspan after the dotcom bust.

 

It said this approach had failed in the US in 1930 and in Japan in 1991 because excess debt and investment build up in the boom years had suffocating effects.

 

... "Sooner or later the credit cycle will turn and default rates will begin to rise," said the bank.

 

"The levels of leverage employed in private equity transactions have raised questions about their longer-term sustainability. The strategy depends on the availability of cheap funding," it said.

 

That may not last much longer.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

8/         For some oil companies, Venezuela is hardly the worst option   (International Herald Tribune, Thu 28 Jun)

 

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/06/28/business/oil.php

 

Comment:    No matter how bad things get for Big Oil in Venezuela, “when compared to other nations, there are still sizable and substantial opportunities.” A good summary of how geopolitics is putting the squeeze on Big Oil, and how Venezuela does not seem so bad after all, in comparison. Makes you wonder what planet the optimistic Big Oil CEOs live on (see last newsletter, items 2 a,b,c,d).

 

Article:    Exxon Mobil and ConocoPhillips have decided the profits are not worth the risk of staying in Venezuela and are writing off multibillion-dollar investments in the country.

 

But other major oil companies have accepted the increasingly tough terms posed by President Hugo Chávez's government because they face few appealing alternatives elsewhere.

 

Terms are even tighter in Russia, they are barred from the Middle East, and Africa comes with its own troubles of violence and instability.

 

"The risks are clearly there and growing in Venezuela," said Patrick Esteruelas, an analyst at Eurasia Group. "But when compared to other nations, there are still sizable and substantial opportunities."

 

Under Chávez, Venezuela first raised royalty and tax rates, then later assumed majority control of all oil projects as part of a larger nationalization drive of "strategic" economic sectors. Chávez says those policies are ensuring that oil benefits Venezuelans instead of foreign corporations and governments.

 

Rising energy prices and Venezuela's huge oil deposits have strengthened his hand. The country's reserves are the largest in the Western Hemisphere and may eventually prove bigger than Saudi Arabia's if it continues certifying heavy oil deposits in the Orinoco River region.

 

... In Venezuela, the terms are now relatively clear: By law, private companies can take as much as a 49.9 percent stake in oil production projects and they face flat income-tax and royalty rates of 50 percent and 33.3 percent, respectively.

 

"Some people think ultimately what the Venezuelans would like is complete 100 percent ownership of those assets. I don't agree," said Derek Butter, an analyst with Wood Mackenzie in Edinburgh, Scotland. "I think they'd be happy as long as they have a majority stake."

 

In contrast, most of Venezuela's fellow members in OPEC block private investment in their oil sectors entirely, as does the other leading oil exporter in Latin America, Mexico.

 

Africa remains open but hardly welcoming or stable for the private oil majors.

 

... "Venezuela has certainly not been alone in tightening terms," Esteruelas said. But he added the terms remained "looser or more attractive" than those of many countries, including Russia, where the government has been more aggressive and companies have had little or no recourse to contest its actions...

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

9/         The Great Corn Con - The Senate's preposterous new ethanol bill         (Slate, Tue 26 Jun)

 

http://www.slate.com/id/2169124/

 

Comment:    The first paragraph says it all: “the production of 36 billion gallons of ethanol per year by 2022—a sevenfold increase over current levels”. Current levels of corn-to-ethanol are already causing inflation in the price of food in the USA, admittedly small compared to elsewhere. However, I suspect that it is food price inflation in the USA that will bring an abrupt halt to the corn-to-ethanol program, sooner rather than later.

 

Article:    The ethanol madness continues! Last week, the Senate passed an energy bill mandating the production of 36 billion gallons of ethanol per year by 2022—a sevenfold increase over current levels. Senators congratulated themselves for their environmental foresight. The president, a biofuels advocate, has enthusiastically endorsed the ethanol surge. But it's almost certainly a fantasy, since no one in Washington seems to have thought for five minutes about where or how that much ethanol could be produced…

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

10/        The Problem's Not Peak Oil, It's Politics          (BusinessWeek, Thu 28 Jun)

 

http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/jun2007/gb20070628_918817.htm?chan=globalbiz_europe+index+page_top+stories

 

Comment:   Stanley Reed is London bureau chief for BusinessWeek. He mistakes Peak Oil, the peak in global oil production, with Hubbert's theory, the peaking of oil production in a region/ oil field because of geological limits. What Reed is suggesting is that geopolitical factors may cause Peak Oil to occur sooner than otherwise would happen due to geological factors alone. Perhaps true, but Peak is near and we are not prepared. Reed also highlights a very typical viewpoint in the western media - it irks that oil producing countries such as Venezuela, Russia and Saudi Arabia are acting in the best interests of their own countries and not those of the Western oil importers / oil companies, by not producing enough oil / not letting Big Oil control oil production. Nevertheless, BusinessWeek seems to be coming down on the side of Peak is near, and perhaps more of its readers will wake up to the oil supply problem. Oddly, the article quotes the Centre for Global Energy Studies in the first paragraph. The CGES does not think Peak Oil is a problem, on the contrary, it usually suggests a rosy picture (although the few CGES reports I have seen were good and suggested otherwise).

 

Article:    Some "peak oil" cassandras warn that global energy production will soon fall into permanent decline. But a more immediate danger to world oil supplies may be the tempestuous politics of many producing countries. Witness Venezuela's move to wrest control of key oil projects from global companies on June 26. The move echoes steps taken in other nations that will likely either decrease production or slow its growth in coming years. "The oil is in the ground, but serious doubts are being raised about whether countries have the desire and means to produce it," says Leo Drollas, deputy director of the Center for Global Energy Studies, a London think tank.

 

Right now, Venezuela is creating the biggest doubts. Its output has declined by about 25%, to 2.4 million barrels per day, since populist President Hugo Chávez came to power in 1999. The main reason: Chávez fired 75% of the managers at state oil company Petróleos de Venezuela (PDVSA) after a strike in 2003. That decision left PDVSA overstretched and ineffective. The plunge would have been disastrous had it not been for increased investment by foreigners. Yet Chávez is making life so difficult for the oil majors that two of them—Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) and ConocoPhillips (COP)—are now walking away. This latest episode is bound to limit future interest in Venezuela and could well push the country's crude production, which had been recovering, back into decline.

 

Venezuela is far from the only producer country that's giving Big Oil nightmares.

 

... This may make sense for the resource-rich countries. Building up a domestic industry and curbing reliance on outsiders could well serve their national interests. But for oil and gas consumers in the U.S., Europe, and Japan, that means a growing dependence on producers that don't share their interests—and likely more years of high prices due to limited supplies, regardless of whether or not global output has reached its peak.

 

**********************************************************************************************************

 

11/        Iran in crisis after cleric's murder          (The Australian [The Sunday Times], Mon 02 Jul)

 

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,22000874-2703,00.html

 

Comment:    Iran imports about 40% of its petrol requirements, and it is costing the Iranian govt a lot of money. The govt has in turn been talking about implementing petrol rationing for months. It finally implemted the rationing last week, with apparently only a few hours notice, followed by riots and the burning of a few petrol stations.

 

Article:    THE assassination of a prominent cleric in an oil-rich Iranian province, coinciding with violent protests in Tehran over the rationing of petrol, has plunged President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad into his biggest crisis since he was elected two years ago.

 

... Protests that followed shortly afterwards over the rationing of petrol convulsed Iran and its increasingly discontented citizens.

 

The rationing is particularly damaging to Mr Ahmadinejad because those worst affected are the constituency that elected him, the poor and disenfranchised.

 

During his campaign he adopted the slogan: "Oil money must be seen on the table of the people." He increased Iran's public spending budget, and promised dams, streets, stadiums, schools and hospitals. Few have been built.

 

His biggest headache is that Iran, awash with crude oil but desperately short of refining capacity, has to import 40per cent of its petrol.

 

Faced with UN sanctions and pariah status over its nuclear ambitions, the regime lacks the foreign investment it needs to build more refineries.

 

On the streets of Tehran last week, housewives who are usually apolitical were throwing his slogans back in his face. "We have some of the biggest oil reserves in the world," said Fatima, 38, a mother of five. "Why do I have to worry if I can pick up my children? The President said he would put the oil money on the tables of the poor. It's all lies."

 

There was chaos last Tuesday when the Government gave just three hours' notice of fuel rationing. Drivers lined up at their local pumps and fought over the last drops of petrol in the face of a limit of 100L a month.

 

Worse still, the private taxis that carry more than half of Tehran's two million commuters a day were subject to the same restrictions and would have had to raise their fares accordingly, from about 10c to 50c.

 

Men set petrol stations alight in Tehran and security forces were called in for the first time since Mr Ahmadinejad was elected. By the week's end, the protests had been stifled, but it was a clear indication of how fractious the population was feeling.

 

Mr Ahmadinejad was opposed to the petrol rationing, but was overruled by the Majlis, the Iranian parliament. His objections centred on the timing of its introduction. He wanted stability while facing American plans to engineer regime change, either through military strikes or by a revolution from within.

 

Little noticed in the media, but keenly watched in Tehran, is the Bush administration's donation of $52 million to Iranian opposition groups. The worry now is that the regime will crack down on domestic freedoms to distract attention from its problems.

 

"They always do this," a university lecturer said.

 

Others predict Mr Ahmadinejad will stand firm. "They bit the bullet," said an Iranian economist. "These guys have the ability to put people on corners with guns. They're not turning back."

 

**********************************************************************************************************